31 March 2008
sixth thaw
Herewith a collection of pensees culled from the recycling bin:- "Our faith in the people is great. Our courage is strong and our dreams for this beautiful country will never die...Perhaps more strongly still, people are driven by a sense of justice, fairness and balance. Where does the striving for justice come from? If we can't get people to love one another-- at least not for now--or even to like one another, then we can guide them toward being more just. To allow ourselves a greater sense of justice, of fairness. I believe it can be justice that determines the relations between people. I find it difficult to dismiss justice in history; that movement towards justice. The entire Enlightenment program thrived on the sense that we must find a fair arrangement in law and wealth. Against hate violence, greed, opposition, we can see justice emerging as a singular force, perhaps the one rational element in history....I've begun to realize how inequality--I mean, specifically, inequality of opportunity-- can be the source of injustice. For if librty only applies to the privileged and strong, then their expression of liberty can be oppressive. Who else right now can afford to be free except for the rich? Liberty means for some the right to do anything you want. But where does this leave others who are scrambling to survive?" --- Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada
- "Reason is more than intelligence: it develops only when the brain and the heart are united, when feeling and thinking are integrated, and when both are rational...The loss of the ability to think in terms of constructive vision is in itself a severe threat to survival."-- Erich Fromm, The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness
Labels: pensees
26 March 2008
the atria affair


Photos copyright Sandamara Images 2004-2007: Puslinch power grid and Lake Huron wind turbine put spotlight on technological changes transforming our lives. Read on, gentle reader, for rationale for this particular photo juxtaposition?
Atria Networks LP provides fibre-optic data services to municipal governments, universities, schools and hospitals in southern Ontario as well as a Wi-Fi Network--a broadband wireless network offering high-speed Internet access using portable devices. Applications such as email, CRM, ERP, Internet VPNs for remote user access and file sharing, connect 1,000 times faster than high speed using conventional phone lines. Fibre-optic cables are ultra-thin tubes of glass that quickly transmit vast amounts of information in pulses of light.
This speedily growing fibre-optic Internet service provider had its beginnings locally and resulted from the amalgamation of four municipally-owned telecom companies: Cambridge and North Dumfries Energy Plus Inc.,
Guelph Hydro Inc., Kitchener Power Inc., and Waterloo North Hydro Holding Company. The telecom companies were created to use hydro corridors to build out the fibre optic cable infrastructure in a less costly and faster way, as an economic development investment. The municipally-owned Atria held $16 million in assets at the end of 2000 and four years later, it was generating $6 million to $7 million revenue a year. Reports indicate the company was
profitable for the five years 2001-06. At the time of its sale to Birch Hill Equity Partners* in 2006, the muncipally-owned Atria comprised of a 3,000-kilometre network of fibre-optic cables , about 1,800 customers and about 60 employees. According to Cambridge and North Dumfries Energy Plus Inc. Manager Grotheer, "Telecommunications are tailor-made for us. We have the poles and we have the knowledge, so we focused on the
companies that needed to move data very quickly." (1)
Since 2006, the no-longer-municipally-owned Atria Networks LP has continued its rapid expansion & purchased other municipally-owned networks across the province: Hamilton ( 600-kilometre network about 220 customers and 16 employees) & those in Barrie, Vaughan, York Region and Simcoe and Grey counties. (2) Most recently Atria Networks LP made its biggest acquisition yet: a $63 million purchase of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc.'s fibre-optic Internet business. Details of this purchase are as follows:
- In 2007, Telecom Ottawa had $16.2 in revenue (1,250 kilometres of fibre-optic cable, about 450 customers and 50 employees);
- as well, Telecom Ottawa had previously bought Trytel Internet, an Ottawa-based Internet provider with 10,000 customers, in order to provide e-mail, web hosting,along with its broadband connectivity;
- "Atria and Hydro Ottawa expect the deal to close shortly. Other suitors can submit better offers to Hydro Ottawa until March 8." (3)
Did our local politicians get the best price for this significant investment of taxpayer monies? Should the publicly-owned utility have been sold? Why all the secrecy? Worth pondering are the following:
- “Details of the transaction remain murky, and the municipal leaders involved in the sale remain disturbingly tight-lipped. This is public money, involving the providers of our electricity. The public is owed a detailed accounting of this sale.” ===> raises questions i.e. “After holding forth Atria as a test case for a new era of co-operation and innovation among the successor companies to the old hydro commissions, why suddenly has the situation changed, and what it means for the future of any other co-operative ventures among the hydro
companies. Most important, are the hydro companies themselves on the block and available to the highest bidder?” (4) - "Carl Zehr, who is on the board of Kitchener-Wilmot Hydro Inc., a fully owned subsidiary of Kitchener Power Corp., said because this is a transaction involving a private company, there are legal constraints against being able to divulge the terms of the sale....Zehr said he is concerned with how the deal appears to the public, but he is bound by legal agreements and his duty as a director of the hydro utility to be quiet for now. But the hydro companies selling Atria make annual reports to the municipal councils that own them. This is how the sale price will be made public: "We were such a pimple in the landscape of technology that we would have been totally lost in this, and the value of our interest would have been diminished over a period of time. So we maximized the profit as quickly as we could."***" (5)
- Steve McCartney, the president of Atria Networks, said, "You don't want your competitors knowing that [i.e. financial details] when you are bidding against them for a contract, .... the company could not expand and grow its market without big-money investment.” (5)==> Steve McCartney was president of the municipally-owned Atria and is currently president of the Birch Hill Equities-owned Atria. For whom was he working at the time: local taxpayers who were paying his salary or for Birch Hill? Gentle reader, please reread and parse McCartney's sentence? as president of the municipally-owned Atria he was required to get the best possible price for local taxpayers cf. Ottawa's situation above: "Other suitors can submit better offers to Hydro Ottawa until March 8."
- Elsewhere? "Epcor, the power company wholly owned by the City of Edmonton, has expanded its customer base rapidly over the past five years -- and is even investing in wind-generation farms in Ontario. Enmax, the successor company to the City of Calgary's utility company, now serves 460,000 customers across Alberta. In 2003, Enmax got into the natural gas marketing business, and is also providing a high-speed, fibre optics Internet service. It's paid off for the municipalities that own these newly deregulated companies. In 1998, the last full year before electrical deregulation in Alberta, Enmax had equity valued at $315 million. At the end of 2005, it had equity of $1.3 billion." (6)
- "In Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge, the significant profits generated by the cities' recently
privatized, but municipally owned, hydro-electric businesses are being increasingly tapped to pay
for big-ticket items that formerly were left to the business and residential tax base to absorb." (7)===> so why sell off a promising lucrative venture that could reap dividends for local taxpayers? - Elsewhere, the " fibre-optic network was also used to create WiFi areas in the city and revolutionize the way hydro and gas meters are read." (8) ===> creates labour-savings as these meters can be read from an administration building and do not require personnel to visit each location to complete the reading; by 2012, all municipalities will be required to install smart meters to measure electricity consumption.
profitable investment that would actually lower our taxes while improving our services.
Kitchener Mayor Carl Zehr and his rubber-stamp sidemen try to make the case that Atria
needs major investment to succeed and, therefore, should be sold off while it still is hot.
With most of the taxpayer-funded infrastructure already in place, it's no wonder that the
buyer wants to keep the sale quiet until it's a done deal.” (9)
so to me, a fundamental part of being part of a public trust is that you do have to be
accountable to the public for everything you do."–Rick Moffitt
which when taken at the flood leads on to fortune;
omitted, all the voyage of their life
is bound in shallows and miseries.
On such a full sea we are now afloat.
-- Shakespeare
Notes: * Birch Hill Equity Partners is the firm formed by the former principals of TD Capital Canadian
Private Equity Partners, the private equity arm of TD Capital Group Limited; Birch Hill Equity Partners Inc. invests in leading Canadian middle-market businesses. This investment [i.e. purchase of municipally-owned Atria] is the fifth in its $850 million fund, Birch Hill Equity Partners III, LP. per company website; **cf. Kit 2008 budget lists Atria proceeds: $4,600,000 in 2006 + $4,614,000 in 1007 = $9,214,000 Kitchener-Wilmot Hydro share of sale price===> how many folks have time to study budget data? *** 06 municipal elections and 0% tax increase to get re-elected???
(1) Sources: (1)Dave Pink, “Players debate brighter ways of delivering power services, “ The Record 8 Jul 06; (2) MATT WALCOFF, Atria still gobbling up fibre-optic networks, the Record January 09, 2008; (3)MATT WALCOFF, Atria makes its biggest acquisition, The Record February 26, 2008; (4)"Atria sale raises questions,” Record editorial 28 October 2006; (5) ROSE SIMONE AND TERRY PENDER, “Atria's quiet sale sparks outrage, “ The Record 2 Nov 06; (6)Dave Pink, “Players debate brighter ways of delivering power services, “ The Record 8 Jul 06; (7)"Cookie Jar of Gas and Hydro,” Record editorial 13 Jul 06; (8) taken from either City of Windsor or City of Chatham website as RR was researching smart meters for a previous blog. (9)Howard Bonnell, “Atria deal is dubious” letter to editor The Record 4 Nov 06.
Labels: energy, technology
14 March 2008
creativity's cutting edge
Gentle reader, Rambling Rose requests the pleasure of your company for a stroll through City of Kitchener's historic downtown? Later this afternoon or possibly tomorrow?FYI: Multicultural Film Festival 10-14 March 08 Council Chambers Kitchener City Hall @ 7:00 p.m. is free event featuring local filmmakers who will be screening a dozen short and feature films. Discussions with the directors follow each screening. RR attended on Tuesday night briefly and is planning to return for:
Friday's Solarwind 88 min and/or Saturday's Sleeping Dogs 81 min followed by awards presentations. This is the start of something really fantastic happening locally. First photo: Matter of Taste offers up a selection of gourmet coffees and historical Berlin/Kitchener photos.
it defies gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation and
outward appearance. --Richard Florida
U of T professor Dr. Richard Florida has authored several studies as to the creative city that will survive and thrive in the globalized economy. Herewith, a collage of some of his observations within City of Kitchener current context:“Neighbourhoods like this [Florida is referring to Toronto's Kensington neighbourhood] survived because of the energy and collective force of its people. The bigger challenge now is how does a neighbourhood like this survive in the wake of the opposite force – central cities coming back. [Kensington is] in high demand, the ‘creative age' requires people to live closer to where they work, and this city is safe so you can have kids, so the pressure on this real estate is enormous. Therein is a big tension: How much do you let this neighbourhood evolve in light of market principles?” ===> market principles refer to supply and demand and in this case, the land occupied by an historic building becomes more valuable than the historic building that sits on top of it???
Next photo: front window of Ellison's Bistro, located on Charles Street, invites downtown visitors to sample soul food with "Caribbean, European and Urban finesse"-per Chef Elvis
Florida is critical of global retailing found in every big mall in every city in the world — a collection of "everywhere stores." That global march is visibly advancing ....with chain stores regularly taking over Yonge Street locations voided by older businesses. It's something [Florida] says he has seen all across the city — an older storefront with the windows papered over and a signthat says, "Coming soon: Sunglass Hut." ===> downtown Kitchener has become a hot real estate market: Crabby Joe's wants to open a branch at corner King And Frederick Street; in the process, Crabby Joe's proposes covering over the exterior facades of the former Toronto-Dominion Bank 1959 art moderne building with brick and stucco walls (next photo). To prevent this significant heritage loss in downtown Kitchener, Heritage Kitchener has recommended designation under Part IV OHA 2005. Will Council proceed with designation? The matter will be considered Monday 17 March 2008 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers.
According to Florida, "two groups that tend to build a community spirit that can thwart the destructive urges brought about by juicy downtown real-estate opportunities are immigrants and artists. If you look at the groups of people who are very committed to their place, one group that's obvious is immigrants. They come to a neighbourhood, they become part of a neighbourhood, because their culture is in that neighbourhood. And [the other is] artists and bohemians – whether that's a designer or a sculptor or a painter – who are somehow inspired, like the people who colonized SoHo.” ===> For now, City of Kitchener planners have focussed their reurbanization efforts in two distinct areas: 1) creating an education cluster to bring students & academics downtown; 2) loft conversions to appeal to 1) young tech professionals and 2) empty nesters. Lost in this equation are 1) families with children who need affordable housing: immigrants, artists, and blue-collar and/or service workers = precisely the mix serviced by The Working Centre's three buildings on Queen Street South (third photo) & gaining valuable work experience at 43 Queen St S: Queen Street Commons Cafe that offers up the best, most reasonably priced cup of coffee in all of Kitchener.Based on his experience with a play based on Serbian scientist Nikola Tesla's life, Centre in the Square manager Jamie Grant said, "We discovered the community after we booked the show [500 of the 700 who attended were Serbians]. Ethnic groups are a growing opportunity for us." (2)
— different ways and approaches to solving problems
— which is critical
to innovation and economic growth and development.
-U.S. economist Scott E. Page
- Sources: (1) PETER SCOWEN's walks & explorations with Dr. Florida as reported in Globe and Mail November 10, 2007; December 15, 2007; November 10, 2007; (2) Valerie Hill, half full or half empty?, The Record 9 February 2008.
Labels: urban planning
11 March 2008
from the geography of nowhere to pride of place?

- The first phrase, "the geography of nowhere," appears to have originated with Glen Murray, former Mayor City of Winnipeg & let us trace how he might have arrived at that conclusion: "If you look at the integration in Europe, the North American Free Trade Agreement, and how important cities are, you would conclude that the other end of globalization is localisation." Murray is describing how systems work and that the inevitable outcome of the economic process of imperialism/globalization will require a counter-balancing process that he describes as "localisation." This process appears to take place in cities-- themselves the culmination of the urbanisation process that took us beyond the agricultural society celebrated in the Oasis in the Centre sculpture in the photo above.
- Murray believes that "cities are the most important tool nations have to build quality, success and prosperity in this century." Moreover, "cities have to be places of choice to live in and increasingly, we have to compete for citizenry, for talent, for creativity and investment like we and no other generation has before, because of the mobility of ideas, of people, and information technology capacity, which is instantaneous."
- Globalization has been driven by an utilitarian mindset that is price-based..By saving 10 percent and building it ugly, it means you are not leaving a legacy that anyone is going to celebrate. And when you think of the cities in the world that you want to go to and live in, where you’d want to spend your money, where you want to participate in the creation of wealth and ideas, they’re the beautiful places.* The idea of utilitarian values is that geography of nowhere. It’s the K-Marts, it’s the ‘‘everything looks the same." The geography of nowhere results from a mindset which values functionality and consumption and expresses itself in this slogan."Build it cheap, build it ugly." **
- The second phrase "a sense of place" appears to be cropping up as a reaction to the geography of nowhere. Rambling Rose has seen/heard it in various documents and speeches locally. Did it originate here? with this particular writer?==> "The anchor of place," writes Tony Hiss in The Experience of Place "has an impact on our sense of self, our sense of safety, the kind of work we get done, the ways we interact with other people, even our ability to function as citizens of a democracy. As places around us change–the communities that shelter us and the larger regions that support them – we all undergo changes inside. The danger, as we are now beginning to see, is that whenever we make changes in our surroundings, we can all too easily shortchange ourselves by cutting ourselves off from the sights and sounds, the shapes or textures, or other information from a place that have helped mould our understanding and are now necessary for us to thrive." ==> Rambling Rose apologizes as she cannot link to the source; this particular quote comes from personal archives of 2002, culled long before RR ever dreamt blogging for this community.
- Ultimately, this discourse is a value-driven one and circles around a much larger moral issue. Some years ago Heather Jane Robertson argued against including the huge education sector as a commodity within NAFTA thus:"The presumption that the public good and private interests are synonymous***marks the ideological triumph of neoliberalism, or perhaps the death of history. It takes little effort to demonstrate that, while the marketplace has been an exceedingly effective mechanism to generate wealth, on the whole its success has been achieved because of, not despite, its lack of a moral core. This not a character flaw, but a characteristic. Markets are not moral; they are necessarily preoccupied with self-interest and advantage, and as such are unfit arbiters of what constitutes our collective well being. Public interest cannot be measured or determined by private profit. Neither markets nor their ideological droppings are suitable models for education reform, since the operational imperatives of markets require that those individuals who prosper, those products that survive, and those corporations that succeed do so at the expense of other individuals, products, and corporations. To imagine that the sink-or-swim Darwinism of the markets will somehow translate into success for every student and every school is to forgo consciousness."
Deep & dense readings? Yes, but pertinent locally where:
a) a public good and service, the need for an expanded main branch library, has been subsumed into an issue of private profit disguised as a public-private partnership or "alternative, innovative, creative financing;"
b) the loss of a citizen-owned heritage structure that contained this community's sense of history and pride of place was demolished to make room for what? and why?
Editor's notes: * staff planner commented: " folks drive to Stratford or Guelph" & RR nods knowingly as she does the same; **the new Kitchener market is inherently cheap and ugly building-- a few concrete slabs that chill the soul & RR rambles to the Waterloo farmer's markets for the cultural shopping experience; *** the essential flaw in building a public library on public lands with private monies driving the agenda aka the P3 process.
Recently the North American community mourned the loss of Jane Jacobs, who counted herself a citizen of New York and most recently Toronto, as she advocated for each in turn. The lessons of her life can still be applied by all of us: "With humility and common sense, she taught the world how to understand and value cities through direct observation, persistent questioning and discovery. Her faith in the wisdom of local citizens lives on in the civic battles in which she participated and her wisdom lives on in the writing of her nine seminal books." -- The Center for the Living City at Purchase College
"Every good
and excellent thing in the world
stands moment by moment
on the razor edge of danger
and must be fought for."
--Thornton Wilder
Labels: ethics, urban planning
09 March 2008
fifth thaw


This region's fifth thaw occurred the day Elton John played at the Aud-- a sunny warm day sandwiched in between heavy snowstorms. The perfect metaphor for the events of this past week as the ticket sale fiasco exposed the preferential treatment given to a privileged few and shone light into dark corners of City Hall. Small wonder that this City's elected officials found themselves constantly trying to dig themselves out from under ever more questions and negative publicity. Thus far, RR has sifted through summary notes (approx 6,500 words) condensed from approximately 75 sources (news articles, editorials, opinion pieces, letters to editor, and posts to online media. What to make of all of this?
Certain sentences stick out and in particular this one: "Aud general manager Kim Kugler reveals much of the official city mindset, and what is wrong with it." Ms Kugler went on to clarify: "In every community, there is a need to take care of some community sponsors and leaders. We always encourage them to come." Accordingly Aud management used taxpayer dollars to purchase tickets from the event promoter to be given free to "some community sponsors and leaders" to encourage them to come. (1) The words encourage/encouragement prompted another review of the summary notes. During his interview with Canada AM, Mayor "the gingerbread man" Zehr commented,"The encouragement is for us to be there to understand how the auditorium works and functions for a variety of events." (2) Interesting use of words that prompts the question as to whether Council and Aud management conferred to align their responses under media questioning. If so, totally inappropriate behaviour? RR continues to ponder the Record's implied question, "What is wrong with the official mindset?" It would appear the larger community too is pondering the entire fiasco as the issue refuses to go away.
Does this "need to take care of some community sponsors and leaders" translate into a need "'[to grease] the palms of politicians by a tax- supported facility" (3) or speak of "the buddy system which seems entrenched in our municipal government" (4)? Is only the Aud affected by such a mindset? or the entire system? The entire issue touches on the relationship between those elected to wield power and the public servants who serve them. James Travers clarified that relationship in an opinion piece (5): "Stephen Harper is right when he says policy is set by the prime minister, not public servants...No question, advisers advise and election winners decide. But servant and master are connected by an essential process known as speaking truth to power. It's every deputy's duty to provide their minister with the benefit of empirical analysis, historical continuity and collective wisdom." If the relationship between public servants (Aud management) and elected officials (Mayor and Council) has become distorted by "encouragement" such as a $137.50 free ticket to review the facility's operations, how are issues of transparency and accountability impacted?
Elsewhere in her papers, RR found a clipping dating back to 28 September 2007, the International Right to Know Day. The column poses this question: "How can we as citizens make up our mind on subjects that concern us all if we don't have the relevant information? and then categorically states: "Right to know is a principle that states citizens have the right to free, timely access to information on what our government is doing. Because a free and open society absolutely requires that we know what our officials are up to. What they're doing right. And here's the uncomfortable part, what they're doing wrong." The reverse of the clipping shows the same column with information blacked out to leave only these words: "We have a right to know." What? for example, the sale price of municipally-owned Atria Wireless Networks in 2007: taxpayers were told that this information had to be kept essentially private; however, in the past week careful readers of The Record's business section learned that the sale price had been $20,000,000 paid out to four local councils (Guelph, Waterloo, Kitchener, and Cambridge). It appears to be common knowledge now; however, taxpayers in each city were denied their right to know and to judge whether elected officials had made a wise decision.
Closely allied to the issue of preferential treatment for some is the conflict of interest issue and municipal code of conduct/ethics. City of Sudbury is way ahead of Kitchener in this regard. That City Council's decision to bring in an outside public relations firm will turn out to be $12,000 well spent. A prompt mea culpa and apologies ensued as well as the decision to stop the practice immediately and to commence on a full review of that city's municipal code. Worrisome in the City of Kitchener's response is the promise to have staff review the practice--note the practice--does that cover free tickets to the Aud? or to all municipal enterprises? Will the review touch on the City's municipal code and provide for more real transparency and accountability that ensures the taxpaying public's right to know? Taxpayers have rightly become more skeptical in response to this Council's cynical, self-serving behaviour as only one Councillor promptly gave her tickets to someone who would never have had a chance to experience Elton John.
This, gentle reader, has been a lengthy detour from the original post RR was working on: "the more things change, the more they stay the same" that was going to look at the historical relationship between Berlin/Kitchener and Galt/Cambridge still very much in evidence in terms of negotiating GO service access for the region. However, the different attitudes in these two communities cropped up even in the ticket fiasco.
Apparently Cambridge Mayor Craig couldn't resist commenting on the issue and had this to say: "I was just kidding with him... Mayors live under a microscope and sometimes make mistakes." (6) Time will tell how costly this mistake will prove for this Council as "Hell hath no fury like the taxpayer scorned." (7)
1,477 people -- 88 per cent -- who responded to a Record online poll wanted Council to return the tickets + another 65 who wrote negative opinion pieces on the issue = 1,542 vocally dissatisfied residents. What about the silent majority? If one uses the rule of thumb that for every one person who writes a letter another 30 feel the same way, the net impact of this mistake is astounding: 1,477 +65=1,542 x30= 46,260 voters have now formed a negative impression of the character and trustworthiness of the Current Council. Will they forget or change their opinion by 2,010? Time will tell. For analysis of 2006 election see previous blogs.
Sources: (1) TERRY PENDER, Tale of two cities' take on tickets, The Record February 27, 2008 (2)UNNATI GANDHI , Public irate as councillors hop queue for Elton John, Globe & Mail March 1, 2008 (3) Snively letter to editor; (4) Zinger letter to editor; (5) James Travers, Prime Minister must be guided by foreign policy tradition; (6)TERRY PENDER AND FRANCES BARRICK, 'What else is going on?,' The Record February 21, 2008; (7) Hay letter to editor.
Labels: ethics
03 March 2008
public trust or private gain?

Your patience, gentle reader, is requested as this rather longish blog takes shape. Subject? the furore over ticket sales for the Elton John concert taking place tonight in Kitchener--one of only two concerts scheduled by the legendary singer for his 2008 North American tour. The other concert took place last night in Sudbury-- that city too had to deal with public outrage over the manner in which ticket sales were conducted. The public outrage over this issue acquired national proportions with local coverage in both cities picked up by the provincial/national media. RR's challenge now is to make sense of approx 5,000 words summarizing 60 sources & in the process fillet a few red herrings and peel some sour grapes.
Why deal with this particular issue? Per Globe & Mail, "At the heart of it, the question is whether elected officials should be able to use their position for personal gain." (1) Closely tied into that is the issue of public trust: “These people have been voted in with our trust and when that trust is broken, it’s time to go." (2) A Kitchener taxpayer saw the issue in this light: "an absolute abuse of power and position." (3) Other taxpayers were concerned with this city's national reputation: "Kitchener has grown too large to continue to be operated on the buddy system which seems entrenched in our municipal government. [Council's behaviour has brought] disrepute to the city and makes us look like a hick town throughout the country...another black eye." (4) The local rag followed up thus: "Rick Mercer has introduced our mayor to the rest of Canada and subjected him to ridicule from coast to coast in The Mercer Report, "A Kitchener city councillor's work is never done" (www.cbc.ca/mercerreport). (6)
This story acquired national proportions as noted by SUDBURY STAR: "What should have been a relatively minor two- or three-day local issue, eventually appeared on - take a deep breath - Google.ca's front page, Sympatico.ca, CTV's Canada A.M. (twice), The Canadian Press (twice), Canoe.ca, The Kitchener-Waterloo Record, The Toronto Star (twice), seven minutes on CBC Radio's As it Happens (which runs on American Public Radio in the U.S. and worldwide on Radio Canada International's shortwave service), CBC Morning North, CBC Points North, Yahoo News, exclaim.ca, Cossacks.org.uk, something called "andpop.com" and several more esoteric sites. We even fielded an interview request from a radio station in Montreal. (We didn't do that one.)" (5)
Even the Maritimes followed up with a story, "Mayor warns councillors about free Elton tickets," By MICHAEL LIGHTSTONE Staff Reporter Fri. Feb 29 - 6:53 AM Nova Scotia Chronicle Herald, as it appears that Halifax does on occasion reward its mayor and councillors with freebies.
Sources: (1)Public irate as councillors hop queue for Elton John UNNATI GANDHI March 1, 2008 Globe & Mail; (2) Sudbury resident quoted here: Mayor warns councillors about free Elton tickets By MICHAEL LIGHTSTONE Staff Reporter Fri. Feb 29 - 6:53 AM Nova Scotia Chronicle Herald; (3) February 23, 2008 Scott Snively letter to editor; (4) February 23, 2008 Virginia Albert letter to editor; (5)More questions, still no answers about Sudbury's Elton John tickets Posted By SUDBURY STAR EDITORIAL OPINION to Sault Ste Marie This Week; (6) February 28, 2008 RECORD STAFFRick Mercer skewers Kitchener councillors; (7) March 01, 2008 AL COATES RECORD STAFFMayor, city councillors just don't get it.
Labels: ethics
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
